stanford prison experiment ethical issues

Later on, he claimed that the experiment’s “social forces and environmental contingencies” had led the guards to behave badly. §  They truly began to see the prisoner participants as threats to this book provides a discussion of ethical issues devoted specifically to a particular method (e.g., experimental design, survey), this chapter will highlight the general ethical considerations everyone should consider before beginning his or her research. Describe the ethical issues related to conducting research with children and prisoners. They also signed up for this experiment so they should have been aware of what was going to happen to them. "You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy", Don't use plagiarized sources. L et’s begin with a thought experiment (or a trip down memory lane, depending on your earlier exposure to this example). Often, suspects are made to wait hours in a holding cell before they have any means of contacting the outside world. of being arrested and detained. The prisoner participants were taken through the actual process What happened in the Stanford Prison Experiment? Unexpectedly, the prisoners were arrested by the actual Palo Alto Police Department, booked and jailed. This was the eventual end of the Stanford Prison Experiment. Retrieved from https://graduateway.com/ethical-implications-of-the-stanford-prison-experiment/, This is just a sample. They would not be permitted to wear underwear, but they would wear a stocking cap to simulate having their heads shaven, and a small chain to reinforce the idea of captivity. One of the ethical issues surrounding the Stanford prison experiment was the _____. Before bringing in the prisoners, the guards received an orientation in which they were told that physical violence was not permitted and that they could run the prison however they wished. Either of them could have been a guard or a prisoner. 1. In my opinion, I think it was ethical to do this experiment because they were trying to see what the reaction would be if they split up people being guards and prisoners. The most unexpected result was that Zimbardo himself had trouble separating himself from the experiment: It wasn’t until much later that I realized how far into my prison role I was at that point — that I was thinking like a prison superintendent rather than a research psychologist. There were a few prisoners who became ill due to the stressful conditions, and Zimbardo made it difficult for those participants to leave. The experiment is important because it demonstrated how easy it is for prisons to become inhumane, run by guards who treat prisoners like objects rather than people. Stanford prison experiment. The same also applies to any experiment where the participants are physically harmed. §  Prisoners were assigned numbers in place of their names. The study has received many ethical criticisms, including lack of fully informed consent by participants as Zimbardo himself did not know what would happen in the experiment (it was unpredictable). §  The prisoner participants were taken through the actual process The Stanford Prison Experiment ended abruptly on August 20, 1971, when Dr. Christina Maslach came to visit Zimbardo and was disgusted by the events taking place, finally snapping Zimbardo out … So why was the Stanford Prison Experiment … Slide Show. In the case of the Stanford Prison Experiment, the study should have been closed on ethical grounds when the “guards” began to inflict egregious pain and humiliation on the “prisoners”, both physically and psychologically. They truly began to see the prisoner participants as threats to Secondly, what were the ethical issues in the Stanford Prison Experiment? Despite the fact that participants were told they had the right to leave at any time, Zimbardo did not allow this. This leaves them confused and often dehumanized as they are ignored by law enforcement personnel. Psychologically, the experiment supported cognitive dissonance theory, in which a person’s reality changes to dramatically from what he or she is used to that they have no choice but to accept and embrace the new circumstances. Das Stanford-Prison-Experiment (deutsch: das Stanford-Gefängnis-Experiment) war ein psychologisches Experiment zur Erforschung menschlichen Verhaltens unter den Bedingungen der Gefangenschaft, speziell unter den Feldbedingungen des echten Gefängnislebens. The website has slides and movies of the experiment, which were done very realistically. The few parents who were concerned about the prison conditions appealed to the superintendent, Zimbardo, for special treatment, just as the parent of a real prisoner would (Zimbardo, 1999). §  Their unjust treatment of the prisoners became more brutal as Their unjust treatment of the prisoners became more brutal as Ethical guidelines for the protection of participants from physical and psychological harm were developed as a result of the Stanford Prison experiment. Also, the prisoners did not consent to being 'arrested' at home. Dehumanizing prisoners does not benefit anyone; rather, prisoners are more likely to show a willingness to do what they are told if they are treated humanely. Situationist Ethics. (APA,2002) In the SPE, the do them harm. The experiment was intended to be conducted for two weeks, but conditions were such that it had to be shut down after six days. Ethical issues that challenged the subjects who partook in the experiment moral values and behavior. The prisoners were eventually divided into two groups in order to make them think that there were informers among them, and many of the punishments led to an unsanitary environment. The remaining participants would be on call. Unfortunately, it is common in most prison systems. §  They were placed in solitary confinement at times. In the prison environment, controls must be in place to prevent the guards from becoming cruel dictators and the prisoners from accepting inhumane conditions without complaint or recourse. Additionally, the participants who were selected as prisoners did not give consent to being arrested at their own homes because the … Retrieved January 10, 2007, from The Stanford Prison Experiment Web site: http://www.prisonexp.org/pdf/consent.pdf, Zimbardo, P (1999). Retrieved January 9, 2007, from Wikipedia Web site: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment, Saletan, W (2004 May 12). Retrieved January 10, 2007, from Stanford prison experiment Web site: http://www.prisonexp.org/slide-21.htm, Ethical Implications of the Stanford Prison Experiment. Some of the participants had mental breakdowns due to the circumstances. The study has received many ethical criticisms, including lack of fully informed consent by participants as Zimbardo himself did not know what would happen in the experiment (it was unpredictable). competence, based on their education, training and supervised experience. Help, Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay, Get help form professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself, Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay, Do not copy and paste free to download essays. This code requires On the fourth day, Zimbardo tried to move the experiment to an actual jail in order to prevent escape, but his efforts were thwarted by the Palo Alto Police Department for insurance reasons. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy, The input space is limited by 250 symbols, Ethical Implications of the Stanford Prison Experiment. The experiment was perceived by many to involve questionable ethics, the most serious concern being that it was continued even after participants expressed their desire to withdraw. This is a direct violation of the APA Code of Conduct. Zimbardo expected that, as a defense, the guards in charge of the Iraqi prisoners would state that their environment dictated their actions. While Zimbardo had all participants sign informed consent forms, even he did not know what would happen due to the unpredicatable nature of the experiment (Zimbardo et al., 2000). Most agreed and were denied parole. In other words, once people started being harmed beyond just a few verbal jabs, the experiment became unethical. Psychologists and law enforcement learned that without specific rules, guidelines and limits, it is easy for prison guards to escape into their roles and to treat prisoners inhumanely. 2. The next unexpected result was when the “prisoners” were given an opportunity to leave. There were many ethical problems with conducting this experiment. We can see this on the social psychology experiment of Phillip Zimbardo Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) of 1971 when the results and conclusions from the experimenters were released to the public it was only matter of time for criticism to invade it causing controversy over both scientific and ethic rigors. Zimbardo concluded that the experiment showed the effects of treating prisoners inhumanely, and how giving individuals too much power can be dangerous. Even a participant who joined the experiment for subversive reasons found himself deeply invested in his role: We later learned, while censoring the prisoners’ mail, that he was a self-styled radical activist. Zimbardo failed to “notice the subtlest dangers and … The experiment had to come to an end after five days even though it was meant to last two weeks. The next problem was that Zimbardo did not actively direct the experiment. Prisoners have no choice but to put up with the conditions of the prison to which they’re assigned; no one takes their complaints seriously. Neueste Erkenntnisse bezweifeln die korrekte Durchführung s… Ethical Issues of the Stanford Prison Experiment. (2007 Jan 4). They were stripped naked and deloused; the delousing is important in order to prevent the spreading of diseases or bugs such as lice, but forcing prisoners to appear naked in front of others is humiliating. Due to the lack of guidelines, the prison environment quickly became chaotic. Next, the prisoners were made to wear uncomfortable clothing and were denied underwear, further dehumanizing them and ensuring that their prison stay would be uncomfortable on the most basic level. Visit the Stanford Prison Experiment website to learn more about this famous experiment. The first concerns the consent form that the participants signed before joining. A. type of food given to the subjects B. blurred boundaries between researcher and subject C. cost of the experiment D. ease of participating in the experiment We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. "2 Other critics suggest that the study lacks gener… This was demonstrated by the riots that occurred at real prisons following the experiment. Ethical issues. Many of the steps taken in the experiment were unethical, one being the fact that the subjects were arrested without consent. (APA,2002) In an article written in the Stanford Magazine that reflected on Stanford Prison Experiment: The issue of Ethicality By: Emad EMAM- March 2012 In 1971, a research was conducted in which subjects played the roles of prisoners and guards in a period of time simulating the prison environment for the purpose of studying a number of problems of psychological and sociological relevance1. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order. You can get your custom paper from The participants were primarily white, middle class males who were college undergraduates. The Stanford Prison Experiment is frequently cited as an example of unethical research. Der Versuch wurde 1971 von den US-amerikanischen Psychologen Philip Zimbardo, Craig Haney und Curtis Banks an der Stanford University durchgeführt und vorzeitig abgebrochen. Any experiment that places its participants under enormous psychological stress could be considered unethical. The Stanford Prison Experiment has since become required reading for college Psych 101 classes everywhere. Zimbardo acknowledges the ethical problems with the study, suggesting that "although we ended the study a week earlier than planned, we did not end it soon enough. If you need this or any other sample, we can send it to you via email. He allowed the guards to run the prison as they wished and did not intervene when it became clear that the prison was out of control. do them harm. Essay, Ask Writer For This is not a stretch from what happens in a real prison. some of the participants feelings, Researcher Phil Zimbardo admitted that he they got deeper into their roles. This means that it was the situation of being imprisoned that caused their behavior, their behavior was not caused by personality quirks. The participants were recruited through a newspaper ad and underwent tests to ensure that they were physically and psychologically sound before being admitted to the experiment. All subjects willfully consented to assume either part, for $14 every day for up to two weeks. The guards meted out sadistic punishments and the prisoners accepted it. Ethical issues in human research typically arise in relation to population groups that are vulnerable to abuse ("Human Experimentation: An Introduction to the Ethical Issues”). It was expected that the participants would get into their roles, but not to the extent to which it occurred. Ethical Issues. 4. However, as the days and hours grew on, it became evident that the guards -- who had almost limitless decisions when it came to handling prisoners, save physically harming them -- were determined to further humiliate and debase the prisoners through borderline violent means. One of the primary ethical concerns of SPE was the lack of fully informed consent (McLeod, 2016). (Eds.). § In reading and researching the Stanford Prison Experiment, all of the code violations mentioned above were easily recognizable. Retrieved January 10, 2007, from Slate Web site: http://www.slate.com/id/2100419/, Zimbardo, P (1971). One of the ethical issues surrounding the Stanford prison experiment was the _____. They were placed in solitary confinement at times. Next, the experiment proved that prisoners and guards alike succumbed to the situational attributes of behavior. The results of the experiment, though they are thirty-five years old, should be used to determine proper prison conditions and how prisoners in general should be treated. While each methods chapter in . For example, the Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by Stanford University is well-known for its questionable and controversial research methods. Philosophies . our expert writers, Copying content is not allowed on this website, Ask a professional writer to help you with your text, Give us your email and we'll send you the essay you need, Please indicate where to send you the sample, Hi, my name is Jenn The results can impact every aspect of the legal system, from arrest, to trial to imprisonment. Add Remove. researchers to only conduct studies that are within the boundaries of their Despite the fact that participants were told they had the right to leave at any time, Zimbardo did not allow this. In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing Once transferred to the mock prison, they were given numbers to replace their names. The prisoners were told to wait at home on a particular day and that they would be called on when it was time for the experiment to begin. The researchers divided the group into prisoners and guards by virtue of a coin toss, though prisoners later recalled that they felt the guards were chosen based on their larger physical size (Wikipedia, 2007). Ethical Issues to the Stanford Prison Experiment. They were humiliated and mistreated; tormented if you wil. Stanford Prison Experiment Ethical Issues Are Always. Next, they decided on the proper prison garb. Most men are not accustomed to wearing dresses, and real prisoners do not wear them. Get Your Custom Essay on, By clicking “Write my paper”, you agree to our, By clicking Send Me The Sample you agree on the, An Ethical Analysis of the Stanford Prison Experiment, Asch’s Study, Milgram Experiment, and Stanford Prison Experiment, Outline and Evaluate Zimbardo's Prison Experiment, Stanford Prison Experiment to the Atrocities at Abu Ghraib Prison, https://graduateway.com/ethical-implications-of-the-stanford-prison-experiment/, Get your custom When the subjects were arrested, they were blindfolded and left confused as to what would happen to them (Zimbardo, 1999, slide #3). Zimbardo has admitted that he did not initially believe the study would be unethical; however, in the aftermath, he realized the abuse suffered by the participants was unethical (Drury, 2012). Common prison garb is functional, but not comfortable. The study has received many ethicalcriticisms, including lack of fully informed consent by participants as Zimbardo himself did not know what would happen in the experiment(it wasunpredictable). Describing the study briefly 24 undergraduates with no criminal and psychological record were chosen for the research to play the … Zimbardo admitted that during the experiment he had sometimes felt more like a prison superintendent than a research psychologist. Once ensconced within the prison, the prisoners were constantly harassed by the guards. The Stanford Prison Experiment would not be allowed to be conducted today due to the various violations of ethics including depriving participants of the right to withdraw, informed consent, debriefing and the protection from physical and … In 1971 Philipp Zimbardo carried out one of the most ethically controversial psychological experiment the ‘Stanford Prison Experiment’. The Stanford Prison Experiment shed new light on how prisoners should be treated, in light of the fact that prisoners and guards alike quickly fall into their roles and adopt a mentality according to their position. Consent Form. He had volunteered in order to “expose” our study, which he mistakenly thought was an establishment tool to find ways to control student radicals. They felt a sense of empowerment when given responsibilities. “Individual behavior is largely under the control of social forces and environmental contingencies rather than ‘personality traits,’ ‘character,’ ‘will power,’ or other empirically unvalidated constructs,” (Saleton, 2004). The Stanford Prison Experiment was designed in 1971 to test the hypothesis that prisoners and guards are self-selecting; this means that the individuals have certain characteristics that 1) determine the group to which they belong; and, 2) encourage undesirable behavior in the group members. student(prisoners) were subjected to extreme emotional trauma. your own paper. 3. The prisoners at Attica had one chief complaint, and that was a request to be treated in a way that was humane. Prisoners were assigned numbers in place of their names. 1. Research Ethics and. Information from a study that has not gone through any interpretation or processing is said to be _____ data. After converting the basement of the Stanford Psychology Department into a mock jail, it was decided that guards would wear uniforms derived from a military surplus store and prisoners would wear poorly-fitting muslin smocks and rubber sandals. Originally he aimed to study how much our behavior is structured by the social role we occupy. The Stanford Prison Experiment had many issues that started a chain of problems within the experiment. The Stanford Prison Experiment is highly criticized for its ethical issues. of being arrested and detained. b. (2002). to be released after 36 hours because of uncontrollable screaming and crying. This code requires researchers to avoid harm and to In conclusion, Zimbardo’s experiment demonstrated that people will adapt to their surroundings quickly and completely. The Stanford Prison Experiment immediately came under attack on methodological and ethical grounds. The Stanford Prison Experiment was designed in 1971 to test the hypothesis that prisoners and guards are self-selecting; this means that the individuals have certain characteristics that 1) determine the group to which they belong; and, 2) encourage undesirable behavior in the group members. Sorry, but copying text is forbidden on this website. In this video we will learn about the findings and method of Zimbardo's study. Newman, L. S. & Erber, R. (Newman, et.al., 2002 p. 53) In regard to law enforcement, the experiment taught the researchers how important it is to treat prisoners humanely. Reicher and Haslam replicated Zimbardo’s research by randomly assigning 15 men to the role of prisoner or guard. Ethics and the Stanford Prison Experiment In 1971 Philipp Zimbardo carried out one of the most ethically controversial psychological experiment the ‘Stanford Prison Experiment’. Dr. Phillip Zimbardo paid volunteers to take part in the experiment. Originally he aimed to study how much our behavior is structured by the social role we occupy. did not have any firsthand knowledge about prisons prior to conducting the Also, the prisonersdid not consent to being 'arrested' at home. They had no experience with prison, losing their freedom, or with any of the conditions that were forced upon them. At the time, the Stanford Prison Experiment caused a great deal of controversy and was heavily criticized, but what are the Zimbardo prison experiment ethical issues and was criticism of the experiment justified? This tells them immediately that they are no longer people, they are numbers. T. he primary focus of this chapter is on research ethics. Ethical Implications of the Stanford Prison Experiment. This study highlights the need for informed consent and guides future researchers in how (not) to conduct a valid research study. Additionally, what are the ethical issues in the Stanford Prison Experiment? The prisoners were not told partly because final approval from the police wasn’t given until minutes before the participants … In this replication, the participants did not conform to their social roles automatically. The premise of the experiment anticipated that the prisoners and guards might become too invested in their roles, but the consent form does not state that they might be subject to inhumane conditions. With the exception of the riots, the prisoners accepted the inhumane treatment, and the majority did not attempt to leave. Furthermore, the subjects were dehumanized and taunted, and … All prisoners look alike, and they are assigned a number. 6. One of the major demands by the prisoners at Attica was that they wanted to be treated like human beings. He admitted being more concerned with a potential escape plan than focusing on his experiment. Ethics and the Stanford Prison Experiment by Philipp Zimbardo. New York: Oxford University Press. 6. Prisoners were quick to accept the authority of the prison guards and to surrender themselves to the prison environment. The participants who played the part of the prisoners went along with everything that went on. A parole board was convened, and participants were given the opportunity to leave as long as they were willing to give up the participation fee. The experiment was meant to last two weeks, but Zimbardo pulled the plug after six days. As has been seen in other experiments with ethical violations, marginally underprivileged groups are at an elevated risk for exploitation as a result of their position. While this is an exaggeration of how suspects are usually arrested, it is not far off. 5. Twenty-four males (who were mostly white and middle class) were finally selected, though only eighteen would be required for the experiment. In fact, he had planned to sell the story to an underground newspaper when the experiment was over! (2016, Aug 03). A. type of food given to the subjects B. blurred boundaries between researcher and subject C. cost of the experiment D. ease of participating in the experiment . Standard Code 3.04, Avoiding Harm___________________. study. Understanding Genocide: The Social Psychology of the Holocaust. The experiment ended early when 1) a graduate student who had arrived to interview the prisoners objected to the conditions and questioned the morality of the experiment; and, 2) it was discovered that the guards were torturing the prisoners in the middle of the night when they thought no one was watching. Two patients who appeared early on to be traumatized were replaced. The parents of the “prisoners” were permitted to visit, and the visiting day was conducted as it would be at a real prison, with limitations and a half-hour wait. The experiment was perceived by many to involve questionable ethics, the most serious concern being that it was continued even after participants expressed their desire to withdraw.
stanford prison experiment ethical issues 2021